International community fails Zimbabwe

BY DAVID COLTART
BULAWAYO - Zimbabwe is not a nation at war. It used to be able to feed itself and its neighbours. Zimbabwe used to have one of the highest life expectancy rates in Africa, up with South Africa. And these figures cannot just be blamed on Aids. Our neighbouring countries have the

same incidence of Aids as us but their life expectancy figures are better (some substantially better) than ours as is demonstrated below:
Zambia: men 40 women 40
Mozambique: men 44 women 46
Botswana: men 40 women 40
South Africa: men 47 women 49
The reason Zimbabwe has the lowest life expectancy in the world is because there is no other country in the world where there is the following unique combination of factors:
-one of the highest HIV/Aids infection rates in the world;
-pathetic amounts spent on ARV medication by a Government that is more concerned about importing military aircraft from China than it is in protecting the lives of its people;
-the fastest declining economy in the world;
-the highest inflation rate in the world – over 10 times the next highest rate – Myanmar has a rate of 70%, Iraq, a Nation at war 40%;
-the forcible displacement of some 700,000 of the urban poor last year (UN figures) and the bulk of these people still homeless over a year on;
-several million people facing starvation;
-a Government which deliberately underplays the extent of the malnutrition crisis for political/propaganda reasons and on occasions frustrates the operations of the WFP and other humanitarian organisations.
In August 2002 Didymus Mutasa, presently the Minister for State Security (and the person in charge of Zimbabwe’s secret police) said “We would be better off with only six million people, with our own people who support the liberation struggle; we don’t want all these extra people.”
Since he made those remarks the Government has deliberately withheld food aid from people in need and has made it incredibly difficult for humanitarian NGOs to operate. Human rights organisations have documented how food has been used as a political weapon.
With an estimated 3500 Zimbabweans now dying every week (cf. Iraq with 700 per week) it would appear that the Zanu (PF) regime now either doesn’t care about its people or is deliberately engaged in a course of conduct designed to subjugate an entire nation. In the process hundreds of thousands arguably are dying every year in Zimbabwe; deaths which are largely preventable.
International Law has something to say about this:
Article 7 (1) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court defines, inter alia, Crimes against Humanity as the acts of “Extermination” (paragraph [b]) and “Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health” (paragraph [k]) “when committed as part of a widespread attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack”.
Article 7 (2) (a) of the Statute states that an “attack directed against any civilian population” means “a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts (including extermination and inhumane acts) against a civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack”. In other words “attack” does not mean necessarily a “military” attack.
Article 7 (2) (b) of the Statute states that “Extermination” includes “the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of the population”.
In my view crimes against humanity have been committed, indeed are still being committed, by the Zimbabwean Government against the Zimbabwean people. But the international community is complicit because it is looking the other way.
Article 1 (B) of the Core Principles of the International Responsibility to Protect Doctrine states:
“Where a population is suffering serious harm, as a result of internal war, insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state in question is unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of non-intervention yields to the international responsibility to protect”.
The international community is failing in its duty to protect Zimbabwean women and men who can now only expect to live until the ages of 34 and 37 respectively. The silence and inactivity of the international community regarding this catastrophe is profoundly shocking. – David Coltart MP is the Shadow Justice Minister, MDC (Mutambara)

Post published in: News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *