Equality is impossible

The politically-correct aim for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is not achievable.

It is absolutely impossible.

It will never be found.

It will never be discovered.

It will never happen.

The search for ‘equality’ between ‘men’ and ‘women’ is fuelling a never-ending war between ‘men’ and ‘women’. It is like a dog chasing its own tail. It will always be out of reach. And the very act of chasing it is costing us a great deal and causing tremendous damage.

The solution that we need to seek is not ‘equality’

The best that can be hoped for is that people are happy with what is happening. If men and women are equally happy with whatever is the issue of concern, then, if you like, some version of ‘equality’ has been achieved.

But the state of people’s happiness actually depends to a very large extent on the propaganda that envelops them. If the propaganda tells them that they are badly off then their happiness levels will fall and their aggression levels will rise. If the propaganda tells them that they are doing well then their happiness levels will rise and their aggression levels will fall.

If people want ‘men’ and ‘women’ to be happy about each other then they need – amongst other things – to do their best to destroy all those forces that seek ‘equality’ – because these forces will, in practice, forever be creating hostility between ‘men’ and ‘women’ while in pursuit of an impossible goal!

The Equality Scam

For example, if men and women are doing the same job for the same number of hours, then a superficial analysis would suggest that they should get paid the same amount. But, should they?

For example, should a man who has been lawyering or bricklaying for 20 years be paid the same as a woman who has been doing such jobs for only 10 years?

Should a man who can carry two bricks in his wheelbarrow earn the same pay as a woman who can only carry one?

Let us look at a simple job, where skill and expertise are fairly irrelevant to the efficiency with which the job is done – though, quite frankly, there cannot be many jobs like this.

Should men and women get paid the same for dishing out tea in a canteen if they work for the same hours and if they both do the job equally well?

Well, of course, I would say Yes.

But so-called ‘equality’ fanatics, like the feminists, might well disagree, as they keep drilling down in search for ‘inequality’..

1. They might discover that more men than women do this job. And from this they could conclude that ‘equality’ between men and women has not been achieved.

2. The statistics might show that the women tend to spend more of their money on clothes for the job than do men, and that, therefore, women should be paid more – often by sneaking the money back to them through the tax system.

3. The statistics might show that women take more days off work for childcare reasons or for hormonal problems and so they ought to be compensated in some way for this.

4. The statistics might show that women spend more time mopping up the floor than do the men … And so on and on it can go.

My point is that the search for ‘equality’ can never end, and that in the process of searching for this impossible goal, the stirring up of male hatred is usually a major consequence – and, indeed, in the case of feminists, it is a purposeful aim.

For example, recall Hillary Clinton’s speech to the First Ladies’ Conference on Domestic Violence in San Salvador – “Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. …”

But if more women than men were actually killed in wars, does anyone seriously think that Hillary Clinton would have then said that men were the primary victims of war? Of course not.

She would have emphasised the greater number of deaths of women during wars and made a great song and dance about it. When a man kills his partner, he is deemed to be a violent thug. But when she kills him, it is still said that this is because he was a violent thug.

And even though women initiate most divorces, the message from the media and the politicians is that men are abandoning their families.

If boys do better than girls educationally then it is argued that there is bias in the system. If girls do better than boys then it is argued that this is so because girls work harder and/or because they are more intelligent.

What do you think?

Is equality between men and women possible?

Email: editor@thezimbabwean.co.uk

Facebook: https://www.thezimbabwean.co.uk/#facebook

Twitter: https://twitter.com/thezimbabwean

Sms: +27 79 570 9663, +263 736 999 005

Post published in: Opinions & Analysis
Comments
  1. Ed

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *