Artists’ political satire trial opens

HARARE - A Zimbabwe magistrate's court began this week hearing the case of
two artists charged with performing a political satire without approval from
President Robert Mugabe's government.

The artists, Silvanos Mudzvova and Anthony Tongani, appeared before

magistrate Gloria Takundwa on Thursday in the first known trail of artists

in post-independence Zimbabwe for breaching the colonial era Censorship and

Entertainment Control Act (1967).

The artists are accused of performing unlawfully the satire The Final Push –

depicting Zimbabwe’s worsening political crisis – without approval of the

state censorship board as required by law.

The trial opened with three state witnesses – two of the arresting police

officers and the secretary to the Censorship Board – giving testimonies led

by the state prosecution team.

The court heard that the artists had last year applied for approval to stage

the satire from the Censorship Board – a department in the Ministry of Home

Affairs – who refused to grant the artists a certificate authorising the

performance.

Under cross examination by the defence council led by Harare lawyer Philip

Nyakutombwa, the secretary to the Censorship Board, Isaac Chiranganyika,

told the court that the accused pair had acted outside the law by performing

the satire without state authority.

Chiranganyika told the court: “So many plays are denied the authority to

perform by my board for so many different reasons and there was nothing

strange about the prohibition of The Final Push.”

Chiranganyika would not furnish the court the reasons for denying the

artists permission to perform the play whose title is taken from the

opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) party’s failed protest march

in 2003 against President Robert Mugabe’s style of rule.

The protest failed after Mugabe poured armed soldiers onto the streets to

prevent opposition supporters from taking to the streets.

The defence lawyer claimed in court that Chiranganyika had in fact verbally

approved the play on behalf of the Censorship Board and also pointed out

that the fact that the artists had made numerous attempts to seek the board’

s permission to stage the performance showed they had conducted themselves

with the expected diligence.

The defence immediately applied for discharge of the artists arguing that

there was no prima facie case against them.

The magistrate postponed the matter to June 10 when she will make a ruling

on the defence application for discharge. – ZimOnline

Post published in: News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *