Monetary Statement Review – Commentary

Gilbert Muponda
On 30 July 2008 the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe (RBZ) released the Mid-Term
Monetary Policy which included currency reforms.

Whilst the statement had several positive policy shifts the Economy is

unlikely to improve due to the unresolved political crisis arising from the

contentious March 29,2008 election and the run-off in June. In the absence

of an undisputed political settlement Zimbabwe will remain with the crisis

of confidence and as such investment, production and International support

will remain at undesirably low levels.

The currency reforms are welcome in as far as they address the strain on IT

systems and the general burden to the public of traveling with huge amounts

of currency even for simple shopping trips. The public will obviously be

relieved that instead of carrying suitcases to go shopping, now a wallet can

in fact do the trick. Banks which had now been forced to develop various

sub-accounts for clients will now have to re-adjust to normal practices.

These are the immediate and likely only benefits.

The Zimbabwe dollar will however remain weak and under speculative pressure

due to the depleted (non-existent) foreign currency reserves. In addition

the inflation differential between Zimbabwe and its major trading partners

is so high that the Zimbabwe dollar can not sustain its newly acquired value

for any foreseeable future. The Global inflation forecast is approximately

4.8% for 2008.And Zimbabwe’s current inflation is 2.2 million % and

forecasts indicate it could easily hit 100 million % before year end. The

Zimbabwe dollar is therefore likely to depreciate by a margin that mirrors

the inflation differential between Zimbabwe’s inflation and that of its

trading partners and that difference is running into millions.

The removal of Zeroes would have been a perfect measure if supported by

significant balance of payment of support from various sources including

IMF, Africa Development Bank, PTA Bank and the wider international

community. In addition other measures would be required such as building

import cover for 6 to 18 months. The lack of import cover means the nation’s

reserves are basically operating on a hand to mouth basis and as such the

currency can not stabilize just by the removal of zeroes.

The currency reforms in the absence of political settlement which is

required for Zimbabwe to be re-admitted into the Global financial system

means the measure would be a wasted effort in as far as stabilizing the

currency and inflation. The political settlement is key in that the various

targeted sanctions that have been announced are now going beyond individuals

and the latest addition included various listed corporates and numerous

parastatals. The effect of this is to limit the counterparties these

entities can trade with and will in the long run entangle most companies

listed on the Zimbabwe stock exchange. This will further worsen capital

flight and dampen one of the few viable investment destinations that remain

for most Zimbabweans.

The other side is some of the targeted sanctions come with a stick and

carrot approach and upon being lifted Zimbabwe will qualify for various

specific programmes to help rebuild the Economy.

The Mid-Term Monetary Policy mentioned the need to invite private sector

participation in various parastatals. This is a positive measure but needs

to go further and in fact pursue an aggressive privatization programme which

will free State resources only to those areas which the private sector has

no capacity. It is clear most of the recent Quasi-Fiscal activities have

been necessitated by the need to keep parastatals on their feet. This can be

avoided by privatizing most of these institutions many of which have ready

buyers and at attractive prices should this be accompanied by political

settlement.

In the absence of political settlement Privatization may not realize optimal

values as assets are likely to remain depressed due to political

uncertainty. Zimbabwe has attractive assets in mining, telecommunications;

transport, food processing and these assets could be disposed of in foreign

currency and help build stable import cover capacity. Simulteously the

disposal will save the public purse from the now routine rescue missions of

RBZ hand outs to the parastatals.

In addition to export incentives the authorities need a clear plan to

encourage Non-Resident remittals to come through the official systems. Many

nations including Mexico, Cuba, India, Pakistan, Philippines, and Nigeria

have developed channels and institutions to help and encourage their

non-resident citizens to remit more funds back home. This needs to be a

genuine effort which is normally accompanied by the right of these

non-resident citizens being allowed to vote. This is critical to build a

sense of nation-hood and nation building after all remittals with no right

to vote is similar taxation without representation.

Gilbert Muponda is a Zimbabwe-born entrepreneur.

Post published in: Opinions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *