The Forced Migration Studies Programme at the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg summarised the findings of its report in a statement released Monday. The report revealed that the core of the troubles in dealing with the exiles in four Southern African countries is the blurred line between the classifications of ‘refugees,’ and ‘economic migrants.’ The group’s study looked into the official responses to Zimbabwean migration in Botswana, Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique and found that these countries failed to take this distinction into account.
“They [Zimbabwean migrants] can be termed ‘forced humanitarian migrants’ who move for the purpose of their and their dependants’ basic survival. Currently only recognised refugees and asylum seekers qualify for humanitarian assistance and legal protection from a host state,” the report found.
To get protection from the host state, most countries in the region, except South Africa, required asylum seekers to live in isolated camps preventing them from travelling back and forth from their home country. “This makes it impossible for Zimbabweans to fulfil their main need: to send money and goods to their families,” the report detailed. As a result most Zimbabweans failed to apply for asylum and moved between countries as labourers, shoppers, visitors and traders. The needs of undocumented Zimbabweans, therefore, remained unmet. The study also lashed out at the countries’ deportation policies, saying that deporting the Zimbabweans showed a lack of protection from the crisis they sought to escape.
Post published in: News


JOHANNESBURG - A new report released Monday has revealed how Southern Africa is still battling to cope with the large number of Zimbabweans who have fled the country.