The appreciation or relevance of African -ness is located in a multi-racial world. The primary function of defining African identity is first and foremost an exercise in political self-interest and African agency. The power of definition must remain with the majority and today “African” is a term used to super-umbrella all the indigenous ethnicities of the African continent and their modern-day descendants in the Diaspora.
Hence, being African cannot be defined by Europeans or Arabs, in the same way Africans play no part in the definition of “Who is a Jew” or “who is a Caucasian.” Whiteness is defined via a process of exclusion rather than inclusion. While Blackness is an all-inclusive term, a kind of non-white box, which as Fanon said, came into being at the colonial moment.
The very modern formulation of African identity was paramount in Europe’s interest for targeting African people to serve as slaves and colonial subjects. However, the irony does not end there, because as soon as this very identity starts servicing a stronger global African block, then it is challenged by the same people who for centuries profited from it.
The common retort to African identity is nested in the genetic revelation that we are all “out of Africa.” However, modern race did not exist when we “all left Africa.” Moreover, no ethnic European walked out of Africa and into Europe, it was pigmented people who were transformed and genetically altered to give rise to modern races.
This process was over millennium in accordance with the environmental conditions in the specific geographies: White skin in Europe, stocky bodies in the mountains of Nepal. Out of Africa has nothing to do with race, it has to do with genetic science; race is a social reality in human behaviour.
Even if we look deeper into genetics; where did Europeans become European? In Africa or in Europe? Where did Chinese become Chinese? In Africa or in China? Living for 20,000 of years in Europe created the modern European with unique gene mutation, which occurred only in Europe, as a branch from the gene pool of the Central Asia stock. These mutations were in direct response to the climate and events of Europe not Africa. Because if we use this argument then we could also say that, we are all single cell organisms because that is our common origin. The African is the result of a parallel response to the climatic conditions of Africa. While Africans were continuing to respond to the African environment, the modern day European was doing the same, but in Europe.
The 21st century definition of African identity is expanding to include new values, which embed the best African characteristics therefore servicing stronger Pan-African identities. Enriching the paradigm and sourcing from the diverse and complex forms of the global African cultural personality.
None of this includes changing water into wine or White people into African people. Exceptions must not be used to defer the formations of solid definitions nested in self-interest.
No definition can ever be 100% accurate in every instance in our complex societies. We are not Africans because we are African by birth or origin, but we are Africans because Africa is born in us and Africa is in our blood. – Kufakunesu Mawira, Hwange
Post published in: Letters to the Editor
What a load of crap. If you were born in Africa then you are an African regardless of your colour. Black people don’t own the continent and if they think they do, the Arabs will come and sell them again (if they can find buyers)