We must embrace re-engagement

Now that the European Union has effectively resumed direct engagement with Zimbabwe, it is time we took stock of our shortcomings in the past and fully mined the economic and social benefits that come with this.

For 12 years, a carefully selected list of Zanu (PF) officials and companies has been under targeted measures imposed by the EU. Contrary to the spin that the Zanu (PF) government led by President Robert Mugabe has woven all these years, the country was never under sanctions.

The fact is that the EU, in keeping with the Cotonou Agreement, decided to disengage with the government because it had failed to meet essential elements spelt out by the protocol and agreed by all member states. From 2000, Mugabe’s government demonstrated blatant disregard for property and human rights and stood accused of poor governance and electoral fraud.

The EU therefore invoked appropriate and restrictive measures. The former relate to action taken to suspend direct engagement when a country violates the essential elements provided for under the Cotonou Agreement’s Article 9. Restrictive measures entail limiting or removing the privilege of travelling and doing business with EU member states and target individuals and institutions that are perceived to be in violation of the essential elements.

To show that there were no sanctions, the EU, together with the USA (which imposed similar measures), channelled about $2 billion into our country during that time. European companies continued doing business in Zimbabwe while all firms not associated with Zanu (PF) enjoyed the same privilege.

Even though some critics still feel that the EU has prematurely removed the appropriate measures and most of the individuals and companies from its restrictive measures list, this is now a fait accompli.

There are two broad opportunities that the EU decision gives us. First, the resumption of direct engagement must alert our politicians and decision-makers to the things we got wrong that led to international isolation and the collapse of the economy. You can only effectively march into the future if you are well armed with facts relating to your history.

Second, it is obvious that the re-engagement, if properly handled, will help put us on the path to recovery. It has the potential to unlock much-needed Foreign Direct Investment, provide funding for critical sectors and boost the international perception of Zimbabwe – widely regarded as a pariah state for more than a decade now.

The ball is in our court. The days of confrontation are over. We need to be sober and humble enough to admit our own weaknesses. There are several policies that were wrong, chief among them indigenisation and the land “reform” programme, that need a serious and sincere re-look.

Post published in: Editor: Wilf Mbanga
Comments
  1. Wilbert Mukori

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *