Tendai Ruben Mbofana
In the high-stakes theater of Zimbabwean politics, there is a fundamental rule that ZANU-PF has mastered over four decades: never interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake.
If you value my social justice advocacy and writing, please consider a financial contribution to keep it going. Contact me on WhatsApp: +263 715 667 700 or Email: mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com
For the first time since the turn of the millennium, the ruling party finds itself in a position of near-total atmospheric dominance.
The opposition is not just fractured; it is effectively liquidated.
The urban centers, once impregnable fortresses of dissent, are falling like dominos in by-elections.
The path to 2028 is not merely clear; it is paved with the golden opportunity of an unprecedented, total parliamentary sweep.
Yet, in a move that defies strategic logic and borders on institutional self-sabotage, the party seems determined to throw away this “perfect storm” for the sake of Constitutional Amendment (No. 3) Bill (CAB3).
By pushing to move the elections from 2028 to 2030, ZANU-PF is not securing its future—it is handing a dying opposition a lifeline and cannibalizing its own internal succession and growth.
To understand the magnitude of this strategic blunder, one must look at the wreckage of the Zimbabwean opposition.
Since the late 2023 post-election fallout and the subsequent rise and spectacular implosion of the Citizens Coalition for Change (CCC), the country has transitioned into a de facto one-party state.
The departure of Nelson Chamisa from the party he built, following the bizarre and legally dubious interventions of Sengezo Tshabangu, has left a vacuum that no one has been able to fill.
Tshabangu, the self-styled “interim secretary general,” acted as a wrecking ball, using the courts and the partisan machinery of Parliament to recall elected representatives, effectively undoing the will of the voters from 2023.
The irony is palpable: Tshabangu decimated the opposition’s parliamentary presence but never bothered to field candidates in the ensuing by-elections.
He knew he was a pariah to the base.
In doing so, he gifted ZANU-PF a two-thirds majority it failed to earn at the ballot box in 2023.
Currently, ZANU-PF is winning everywhere.
It is winning in the suburbs of Harare and the townships of Bulawayo—areas where, for twenty years, the ruling party’s green, red, and yellow regalia were rarely seen.
This isn’t necessarily because the electorate has suddenly fallen in love with the status quo, but because there is no viable alternative.
The opposition supporter is currently a political orphan, disillusioned and demobilized.
If an election were held in 2028, this demoralization would translate into a landslide of historic proportions.
ZANU-PF could realistically achieve what it has craved since 1980: a clean sweep of every single seat in the National Assembly.
This would be a “total victory” that would grant the party the ultimate mandate to govern without the irritation of a formal opposition.
However, CAB3 changes the calculus entirely, and not in ZANU-PF’s favor.
By extending the current terms of the President and Parliament to 2030, the party is essentially grantingthe opposition a four-year gestation period.
Two years—the time remaining until 2028—is a heartbeat in politics.
It is not enough time for a new movement to find funding, build a national structure, and heal the deep wounds of the Chamisa-Tshabangu era.
But four years?
Four years is an eternity.
By pushing the goalposts to 2030, ZANU-PF is providing the necessary time for a new “Third Force” or a reorganized opposition to emerge, mobilize, and capitalize on the inevitable “regime fatigue” that sets in when a government stays too long.
Why would a winning team ask for a time-out when the opponent is on the ropes and gasping for air?
Beyond the external threat, the internal cost of CAB3 to ZANU-PF is devastating.
A political party is a living organism; it requires the circulation of new blood to remain vital.
Within the ranks of ZANU-PF, there is a generation of ambitious “Young Turks,” provincial leaders, and war veteran descendants who have been waiting for 2028 to take their shot at parliamentary seats.
These are the foot soldiers who organize the rallies and secure the rural vote.
By enacting CAB3, the party leadership is effectively telling its own ambitious base to “stand down” for an extra two years.
It freezes the current crop of MPs in place, many of whom may be underperforming or unpopular, and prevents the natural renewal of the party’s leadership.
This creates a bottleneck of ambition that eventually leads to internal resentment, friction, and “bhora musango” (internal sabotage).
The most troubling aspect of CAB3 is the perception—and the reality—that the entire constitutional framework of a nation is being rewired for the benefit of a single individual.
When a party begins to sacrifice its institutional long-term advantage for the short-term tenure of one man, it ceases to be a movement and becomes a personality cult.
The push for the president to remain in power beyond the constitutional limit is a self-serving ambition by those directly benefiting from his tenure, not a party necessity.”
In fact, the party would be much stronger if it adhered to the constitutional clock, leveraged its current dominance to win a massive 2028 victory, and allowed a managed succession to take place.
Such a move would signal stability to investors and legitimacy to the international community.
With these facts in mind, those within ZANU-PF should actually be at the forefront of resisting and rejecting CAB3.
They must realize that these amendments are not for the benefit of the collective party but for one man.
The party itself is being weakened and forced to sacrifice a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for an election result never seen before.
By pushing for 2030, ZANU-PF is trading a guaranteed total victory in 2028 for an uncertain future where a reorganized opposition has four years to build a challenge.
It is an act of strategic madness to ignore the opportunity to legally and democratically extinguish opposition relevance at the ballot box in 2028.
The logic is inescapable.
ZANU-PF currently holds all the cards, yet it is choosing to reshuffle the deck and give its opponents more time to play.
Moving the elections to 2030 is not an act of strength; it is a tactical blunder that ignores the reality on the ground.
It harms the party’s grassroots, rejuvenates a dying opposition, and taints the party’s legacy.
For the sake of its own survival and the chance to secure total dominance through a 2028 landslide, ZANU-PF must reject CAB3.
To do otherwise is to prioritize the interests of one individual over the health of the institution, a move that history will likely record as an act of institutional suicide.
● Tendai Ruben Mbofana is a social justice advocate and writer. To directly receive his articles please join his WhatsApp Channel on: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaqprWCIyPtRnKpkHe08
Post published in: Featured