Tendai Ruben Mbofana
The gazetting of Statutory Instrument 148 of 2026, declaring September 15 a national public holiday known as Munhumutapa Day, presents a classic study in the political ritual of self-glorification.
To directly receive my articles please join my WhatsApp Channel on: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaqprWCIyPtRnKpkHe08
That September 15 happens to be President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s birthday is presented to the nation as a convenient coincidence of history, wrapped in the solemnity of pre-colonial royal heritage.
By linking the personal milestone of a sitting head of state to the glorious legacy of the 15th-century Mutapa Empire, the ruling apparatus seeks to clothe contemporary political authority in the mantle of imperial permanence.
Yet, history provides an unyielding lesson: top-down self-honoring rarely outlasts the leader who decrees it.
The impulse of political leaders to canonize themselves while still in office is as old as civilization itself.
From Roman emperors who placed their own likenesses on coinage and demanded divine honors, to modern autocrats who renamed cities, months, and state institutions after themselves, self-glorification is the ultimate defense mechanism against political mortality.
It is an attempt to weaponize the state machinery to construct an immortal legacy.
By decreeing a national holiday on one’s own birthday, a leader attempts to transform personal existence into a civic duty, forcing an entire country to participate in an artificial consensus of veneration.
However, monuments, holidays, and titles erected through executive decree suffer from a fatal structural flaw: they lack organic public legitimacy.
True public honors are conferred posthumously by a grateful nation that reflects on a lifetime of authentic service, sacrifice, and statesmanlike achievement.
When honors are self-assigned or orchestrated by fawning political subordinates during a ruler’s tenure, they are perceived not as acts of genuine national commemoration, but as exercises in ego and state compulsion.
They exist only as long as the state’s coercive apparatus remains intact to enforce them.
Zimbabweans should understand this: after 37 years of manufactured veneration, how many people still talk about Robert Mugabe today?
To a sitting leader, state-enforced self-glorification is rarely about vanity alone—it is an aggressive strategy of political survival born out of deep-seated insecurity and fragile self-esteem.
When a ruler knows their authority lacks genuine, unforced legitimacy, the fear of political mortality becomes overwhelming.
By embedding their personal milestones into the national calendar or fusing their individual persona with sacred historical symbols, leaders attempt to transform their rule from a temporary political tenure into an inescapable national reality.
This artificial consensus serves a dual purpose: it signals to political rivals and potential dissenters that the leader’s grip on power is absolute, while simultaneously forcing state institutions, public servants, and ordinary citizens into rituals of public compliance.
In essence, imposing a legacy while still in power is a desperate attempt to manufacture immortality by executive decree, using state power to soothe an insecure ruler’s fear of historical insignificance.
The historical record of such artificial legacies is overwhelmingly consistent.
The moment the mantle of power slips, the monuments inevitably come down.
When Julius Caesar and Caligula fell, the Roman Senate instituted damnatio memoriae—literally deleting their names from public buildings and melting down their statues.
When Joseph Stalin died, the vast industrial complex of state-mandated hero-worship was dismantled within three years during De-Stalinization.
Cities bearing his name—such as Stalingrad, Stalino, and Stalinogród—were swiftly restored to their traditional titles of Volgograd, Donetsk, and Katowice.
His massive statues were pulled down from central squares across Eastern Europe, from Prague to Budapest.
In Zaire, Mobutu Sese Seko required national news broadcasts to open with his image descending through the clouds.
Yet his overthrow in 1997 saw the Zaire, the national currency that bore his face, become worthless paper overnight and his grand symbols erased almost instantaneously.
In Turkmenistan, the rotating golden statues of Saparmurat Niyazov were quietly removed by his own successors once the immediate political utility of his cult of personality had expired.
The tragedy of declaring “Munhumutapa Day” on a sitting president’s birthday lies in the inevitable fate of the name itself.
The Great Mutapa Empire represents a magnificent chapter in African civilization—a testament to sophisticated statecraft, trade, and architectural brilliance that belongs collectively to the people of Zimbabwe.
Appropriating that august title to serve as a high-sounding euphemism for a presidential birthday does not elevate the presidency; rather, it risks cheapening a sacred national heritage.
When a state holiday is tied directly to the political persona of a living ruler, it invites symbolic retribution from future generations.
Instead of fostering national unity, it guarantees that the date will become a point of political contention.
When the political order eventually shifts—as all political orders do—the legal instruments that established such holidays are routinely repealed by successors seeking to demonstrate a clean break with the past.
The holiday is abolished, the calendars are revised, and the public memory associated with the self-honoring leader is eroded far faster than if they had governed with humility.
Real legacy cannot be decreed by statutory instrument, nor can it be secured by high-sounding titles borrowed from ancient dynasties.
It is forged in the tangible well-being of the citizenry, the integrity of public institutions, and the enduring respect earned through humble governance.
When the tide of political authority turns, the decrees fall away, leaving behind only the stark realization that self-glorification is the fastest route to historical oblivion.
Leaders who use state power to honor themselves build their monuments on sand.
- Tendai Ruben Mbofana is a social justice advocate and writer. Please feel free to contact him on +263715667700 or mbofana.tendairuben73@gmail.com