- for electing the 210 constituency members of the National Assembly [section 124(1)(a)]
- for electing the councillors of all urban and rural local authorities [section 265(2)]
This requires registration of every voter on an appropriate constituency and ward voters roll.
Responsibility for Delimiting Electoral Areas
The Constitution does not itself include descriptions of either constituencies or wards. In section 160(1) and (2) it entrusts the delimitation of constituencies and wards to the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission [ZEC].
Note: in the past there used to be separate delimitation commissions which were independent [i.e. not run by ZEC]. They were chaired by a judge and were set up temporarily for each delimitation exercise, which took place before each general election.]
Principles for Delimitation
The Constitution lays down the principles that must be followed by ZEC in conducting delimitations.
Section 161 provides that:
“(3) The boundaries of constituencies must be such that, so far as possible, at the time of delimitation equal numbers of voters are registered in each constituency within Zimbabwe.
(4) The boundaries of wards must be such that, so far as possible, at the time of delimitation equal numbers of voters are registered in each ward of the local authority concerned.”
Section 161 also stipulates that wards should not be divided between two or more local authority areas or constituencies and that in delimiting wards and constituencies, ZEC must give due consideration to:
- physical features,
- means of communication within the area,
- the geographical distribution of registered voters,
- any community of interest as between registered voters,
- existing electoral boundaries, and
No constituency or ward of a local authority may have more than twenty per cent more or fewer registered voters than the other constituencies or wards [section 161(6) of the Constitution].
Note: of particular interest is the provision regarding community of interest between voters in an area. In the past there have been accusations of gerrymandering [manipulation of boundaries to favour a party] by joining urban and rural areas in a single constituency to dilute the urban vote.
When Did the Last Delimitation Exercise Take Place?
The last delimitation was in 2007/8, before the 2008 election. It was conducted in terms of the old constitution, and was based on the Registrar-General’s voters roll. The old constitution made no linkage with delimitation and a population census.
For the first election after the new Constitution came into operation, the new Constitution had a transitional provision [Sixth Schedule, paragraph 5] which provided that “the boundaries of provinces, constituencies and wards as they were immediately before the publication day [of the Constitution] apply for the purposes of the first elections”. So the 2008 delimitation was used for the first elections under the new Constitution in July 2013.
How often Should a Delimitation Exercise be Carried Out?
Section 161(1) of the Constitution lays down when delimitations must take place:-
“Once every ten years, on a date or within a period fixed by the Commission so as to fall as soon as possible after a population census, the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission must conduct a delimitation of the electoral boundaries into which Zimbabwe is to be divided.”
The last population census was held in 2012, and it is not clear from section 161(1) when the next delimitation – the first under the new Constitution – should be held.
Two opinions have been put forward:
- The next delimitation should be held before the 2018 general election. Those arguing for this option contend that the new Constitution did not commence in a vacuum and that 2008, the year of the last population census, must be taken as the start of the ten-year cycle for delimitations. They also point to the need for a new delimitation, given the criticism directed at the 2008 delimitation, which included allegations of blatant gerrymandering in favour of ZANU-PF. An additional point is that the Constitution makes the old delimitation applicable only to the 2013 elections.
- The alternative view is that the next delimitation should be held before the 2023 general election not the 2018 election. Those arguing for this option contend that the ten-year cycle for delimitations started with 2013, the year the Constitution was adopted and came into force, rather than 2008, the year in which the last delimitation was held. This is a more tenuous argument.
. ZEC’s Position: No New Delimitation Before the 2018 Elections
ZEC has said it does not intend to conduct a new delimitation of constituencies and wards for the 2018 elections and will conduct the elections on the basis of the constituencies and wards gazetted ahead of the 2008 elections.
The ZEC position may be based on the questionable argument 2 above but also, having decided to wait until they had completed a new voter registration exercise using Biometric Voter Registration [BVR] before doing a delimitation, they have now run out of time. ZEC has said it aims to complete BVR by 31st December 2017. It would be impossible to complete any new delimitation based on a new roll by the deadline set by section 161(2) of the Constitution which states: “If a delimitation of electoral boundaries is completed less than six months before polling day in a general election, the boundaries … do not apply to that election, and instead the boundaries that existed immediately before the delimitation are applicable.” The latest possible polling day in the general election is the 21st August 2018 [as explained in Election Watch 1/2017 [link]. New electoral boundaries would therefore have to be finally delimited by the 21st February to be valid for use in the latest possible general election. A period of just over seven weeks [1st January to 21st February] would not allow time for a meaningful delimitation exercise that would comply with the Constitution.
What are the Current Options?
Delaying the 2018 general election to allow for an acceptable and credible delimitation based on a new voters roll is out is out of the question. The Constitution has set the timing of the next elections.
So we are left with:
- ZEC’s decision to using the 2007/8 delimitation exercise for the coming elections based on the voters roll for the 2008 elections and the 2002 census. We then face the prospect of a general election conducted on a new and better voters roll but marred by outdated constituencies and wards in which the numbers of voters vary beyond the 20 per cent limit prescribed in section 16(6) of the Constitution. And if the BVR exercise is not completed on time or proves unsatisfactory, we will have to fall back on not only a totally out of date delimitation of constituency and ward boundaries but a voters roll that is generally recognised as seriously inaccurate.
- Doing a delimitation exercise right now based on the voters roll used in the 2013 elections. This may be preferable to using the 2007/8 voters roll. The question is: would ZEC be able to do this now? Or are they now overstretched doing the BVR? Note: If ZEC had registered voters continuously, as it is supposed to do, and had made the voters rolls available –again as it is supposed to do – it would have been possible to conduct a credible delimitation regardless of biometric registration, because the constantly up-dated voters rolls would have formed a reliable basis for a new delimitation.
Failure to conduct a proper delimitation before the 2018 general election is likely to affect the credibility and legitimacy of the electoral outcome. There was cause for concern that the electoral boundaries in the 2013 elections were not accurate or representative of the voter population distribution. That risk will be higher in the 2018 elections. The object of delimitations is to ensure that each person’s vote is equal to every other person’s vote. If there are significant differences in the number of voters in each constituency, the votes cast by voters in constituencies with fewer voters will count for more than the votes cast in constituencies with larger numbers of voters. Delay in holding a new delimitation may mean that constituencies and wards vary by more than the 20% difference prescribed by the Constitution, resulting in court challenges.
In the 2013 elections everything was done at the last minute. The excuse then was that the chairperson of ZEC was new and the Constitution was new and unfamiliar. The excuse now seems to be lack of funds from government. If that is so, the elections are controlled by the political party in power and not by ZEC. BVR voter registration has been delayed so long that a fresh delimitation cannot realistically be held. The previous voters roll has not been made available. The result will be an election that is unsatisfactory at best.
Veritas makes every effort to ensure reliable information, but cannot take legal responsibility for information suppliedPost published in: Featured